hi @power_pille @pmsensi ,
Just as an update, we will revert the change via PG-3097 in the next maintenance release.
We will solve duplicate package names another day -- but we'll do it the "hard way", which is to update all the related tables when it occurs.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @tyler_5201
Thanks for the additional info; so it's not that this is an actual "network drive" just (i.e. far from the server), it just happens to be how the configuration works.
I don't think we can/should try to detect the owner; do you if chown will fail if the user is already postgres? If so, then we can wrap this with a try/catch and throw a more helpful error.
Otherwise, we can try/catch and give a warning. But we want to make sure the user can see it when the database fails to load.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @james-woods_8996 ,
Docker feeds utilize the multi-part upload part of the S3 API, which you can see being used in the BeginResumableUploadAsync method of our file system abstraction.
If they do not implement multi-part uploads, then you will not be able to use it with ProGet. Other feeds rely on that method as well.
I would check w/ the vendor to see what the issue could be - it's possible they simply don't support it.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @parthu-reddy ,
This behavior is expected; these have a status of "unlisted", which you can see on NuGet.org if you look in the API or type in the URL directly:
ProGet does not hide unlisted packages by design, but shows them with an unlisted icon instead.
Thanks,
Alana
@power_pille @pmsensi thanks for helping to investigate this
What I can say is this is most definitely a regression in ProGet 2025.8 caused by PG-3047 -- I'm not sure if we want to revert that change or fix it. But rolling back to ProGet 2024.7 will definitely address the issue.
As for casing, it's all really strange to honest - some package ecosystems (rpm) are case sensitive, and different packages that differ by casing. Most are not insane like that.
However, due to a bug from a while back, "bad data" snuck into the PackageNameIds table from a vulnerability database update -- and that's why NuGet has those duplicates. Clearing them "blindly" from databases in the field isn't easy, but the feed reindex was a step in that direction.
Anyway we're going to continue researching how to address this
Hi @yaakov-smith_7984 ,
It looks like we forgot to ship the updated extension in 2025.8, so it's not "included" when you install ProGet. You should be able to update under Admin > Extensions, but unless you make the extensions directory (under Admin > Advacned Configuration) mapped to the docker host it will not "survive" a container reboot.
We could get you a prerelease container version if you'd like to try it as included, just let us know
Thanks,
Alana
@misael-esperanzate_5668 thanks for the reproduction details!
I was ablet to reproduce this very easily and fixed it via PG-3091 - it was an ordering problem
This will be in the upcoming maintenance release this Friday
Hi @tyler_5201
I'm not really familiar with all this topic, but why would you want to put the database file on an NFS? The PostgreSQL docs on clustering seem to warn against this.
That said, we added the chown command during early testing because PostgreSQL was failing with something like this:
The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "postgres".
This user must also own the server process.
The only way to get to work was:
$kubectl exec -n -i -t -- bash -il$cd /var/opt$id -u postgreschown -R 101:101 database/Hence, why we added the chown.
I'm not sure the best approach here -- we could try/catch, but I think the postgres user still needs to own the files?
Cheers,
Alana
Hi @kc_2466 ,
Understood, that was the same reason given before.
Our products' AD/LDAP integration works different than JIRA/TeamCity (live lookup vs sync) so it's just not that simple.
We're not willing to add complexity to work-around "dumb" organizational policies -- what you described is the whole point of AD/LDAP (centrally administered access).
It's possible to delegate group administration in AD, but if they don't want to do that... I guess they are okay with you just creating less-secure built-in users until they get around to completing their tickets ;)
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @thomas_3037 ,
ProGet does not support these, as they are not "real" Debian repositories:
These are used only by the Debian installer and are not installed on a Debian system under normal circumstances.
Unlikely we would add support for them, given the highly-limited use case.
Thanks,
Alana
@tames_0545 I just thought of something, perhaps try a different versions of ProGet, instead of latest -- like maybe 25.0.3, 25.0.4, etc, perhaps into ProGet 2024 as well
Hi @tames_0545 ,
Sorry, no idea -- there is definitely something wrong with your environment but aside from the advice I gave earlier, I don't have any other troubleshooting steps. You may want to try a different environment / Docker host.
As I mentioned, it could something wrong with your database mount (/opt/proget/database) -- maybe that is getting deleted? Or it could be your security configuration that is interfering with the running container. We have seen some hyper-aggressive security tools that make things so secure nothing runs.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @tames_0545 ,
A connection string should not be specified.
I haven't seen this behavior before; the container runs postgres on start to listen to port 5728 and I can't imagine how that would fail without an error message.
Perhaps there's some kind of issue with /opt/proget/database and that's causing the postgres process to crash; I would start here.
The only other thing I can imagine is some kind of security configuration that is interfering with the running container.
I would keep it as simple as possible. Once you get it working, you can try adding in the encryption key. Unless you absolutely need to use a Docker secret (those are complex and don't really do anything), just specify the encryption key with an environment variable
-e PROGET_ENCRYPTION_KEY='37D27A670394F7D82CE57F1F07D69747'
Cheers,
Alana
Hi @kc_2466,
Thanks for the suggestion; we've had this request in the past but don't believe it's a good fit.
It ought to be trivial to add a group to the AD/LDAP server, so it doesn't make sense to add a "quasi-group" feature on the ProGet end. That would increase complexity and could introduce unbehavior that is challenging to support and troubleshoot.
We haven't seen other products doing something like this, likely for these reasons.
Cheers,
Alana
Hi @m-lee_3921 ,
Thanks for the heads-up; we'll get this fixed via PG-3059 in the next maintenance release (scheduled for later today).
And you're right -- its basically the same issue. SQL Server silently truncates string values whereas PostgreSQL does not, hence these errors.
We decided to not auto-truncate, since it's better to know about these cases than not. In this case, it's a IPv6 address that was longer than the 20-character limit. We plan to refactor API key logging at some point, so we'll just continue to truncate v6 IPs.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @carsten_1879 ,
Can you try out buildmaster:25.0.0-ci.23 container image?
I would do a new/fresh installation - new applications created in it should use the new Git library. It seems to work, but would like to see if it works for you as well.
Thanks,
Alana
@it_6176 thanks for sharing!
You're right, we did not consider this usecase when designing Debian connectors. Our "default mode" in ProGet is "dynamic indexes", but the quirkiness of the Debian repository "API" and obscene size of operating-system libraries make that impractical when there is a lot of feed activity (i.e. packages being added to the feed via caching).
We are going to redesign this at some point, and allow for some kind of "periodic indexing" for some connectors. That would be run as a job, as opposed to triggered by a user's request.
As for the database.... we've had one other user report that those SQLLite databases "blew up" as well, and our conclusion is that "something" crashed at the wrong time. Probably, due to the resource overusage? It has something to do with the WAL Files, but we're not totally sure.
I think we just need some kind of regular clean-up for these "huge" connectors so the database doesn't get so huge.
Hi @caterina ,
I agree and there doesn't seem to be any good usecases or official guidance from npm tags command, but we do not recommend using them: https://blog.inedo.com/npm/smarter-npm-versioning-with-semver/
From the api/technical standpoint, npm tags are a little weird -- a package themselves doesn't contain tags. Instead, the registry has a key/value tag store. By convention, the store has keys like latest and values like 4.8.1, but it seems to allow anything? At least from data we've seen on npmjs.org
In any case, the npm client seems to set a latest tag, so we'll just support that use case then.
FYI here is the logic/code I added:
var tags = await this.GetPackageTagsAsync(purl.Name, false, cancellationToken: cancellationToken);
if (tags.TryGetValue("latest", out var latestVersion) && latestVersion == PackageVersion<SemanticVersion2>.Parse(purl.Version))
await DB.Npm_SetTagVersionAsync(toFeed.FeedId, purl.Name.Id, "latest", purl.Version, DateTime.UtcNow);
It sets the latest tag on the other feed if the current feed's latest tag points to the package you are promoting.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @caterina ,
This behavior is expected as only the package itself is promoted, not repository metadata.
I'm not an npm developer, but one concern I have is that the latest tag doesn't always refer to the most recent version of a package? It's a little confusing to be honest, but I read that developers will sometimes use latest to "pin" what they feel is the most stable version?
I don't understand why this is a practice in npm, but I think this is probably an exception. So, we will change the behavior via PG-3057 such that the "latest" tag is set on the new feed when promoting latest-tagged npm package.
This will be in the next maintenance release of ProGet 2025.
Cheers,
Alana
Looks like this is a regression in ProGet 2025; we'll get it fixed in the next maintenance releaese, scheduled for this Friday via PG-3056
Cheers,
Alana
Hi @kc_2466 ,
Can you share how / why you're create Universal Packages in the UI? And perhaps how you're using upacks in general?
We added them as a way to introduce the format to new users, but didn't really anticipate it being used beyond that.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @kc_2466 ,
We'll Add support for LC_TIME environment variable & user setting via PG-3054 in an upcoming maintenance release -- p[robably not this week's, but in the next or following.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @carsten_1879 ,
We should have a build of BuildMaster 2025 later this week that you can try out that includes the new library. We'll let you know!
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @imm0rtalsupp0rt ,
Thanks - I was able to reproduce this issue. It's some long-standing behavior / bug, and not a trivial fix.
We will see about fixing it in the upcoming maintenance release (PG-3048), but it's lower priority and will likely get pushed back a few releases.
Cheers,
Alana
Nice idea! That was pretty trivial to add in there, and will be in the next maintenance release via PG-3038:
I'm not really sure, but I'll explain how things work so it might help troubleshoot.
First, the Maven API does not provide a file listing. While you (as a user) can often "see" via an HTML page (like this listing at jboss.org), it's simply not available for listing in the API. The only required file in an artifact is the .pom file, so when you "pull" an artifact to ProGet, that's all you'll get.
Next, the "remote" icons next to the files indicate that they were cached (i.e. added to the feed) via a connector. That means the files were successfully written to disk, recorded in the database... but now they are gone. Hence, why you keep getting the "file not found" message.
The most likely culprit for this is something deleting the files from a packagestore. We often see security tools doing that for "safety" reasons, since they are .jar files that may be dangerous I guess.
Overall, the maven API is a very simple series of GETs. So perhaps, you can just experiment with this? First, start with a brand new feed and a connector.
Then, run the command:;
curl http://my.server.local:8624/maven2/my-new-feed/org/hamcrest/hamcrest-core/1.3/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar --output hamcrest-core-1.3.jar
You should see the file download via CURL. Afterwards, you should see the artifact as a cached package (Top Navigation > Packages > Select Cached). You should also see that .jar file on disk, written to the package store location (Manage Feed > Storage).
If you don't see a .jar file downloaded to that location on disk, then it means something is "blocking" the file being written. If it's there, then it means something is deleting it after.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @rel_0477 ,
Sounds like this is a pretty specific edge case. Can you provide a reproduction case so we can take a look?
Thanks,
Alana
Hi Dan,
In general, a ProGet feed will be slower than a "real" Debian repository. The reason is that Debian repositories are just static file system like this:
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/bookworm/
There is obviously a lot more overhead with each ProGet request, since index files are dynamically generated, involve connectors, need to be permission-checked, etc.
In addition, ProGet indexes the Debian indexes on-demand, which means downloading all of the Contents-*.gz files and indexing those. Like in here: http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/bookworm/main/
While these files are cached, they do need to be updated when the remote repository updates.
And note that each web node maintains its own local index cache, so you will see these long-running requests multiple times. Some organizations will periodically "warm up" the indexes periodically by just hitting the InRelease endpoint.
Hope that helps,
Alana
Hi @sgardj_2482 ,
ProGet's Integrated Web Server already supports Windows Integrated Authentication (WIA). Actually it supports WIA better than better than IIS in that only the Web UI and supported feeds (or ones you configure) will do the WIA challenge.
Behind the scenes, the Integrated Web Server (IWS) uses Kestrel unless you're doing so-called "port sharing", which would be having two web applications sharing the same port. That's becoming less and less common, and isn't something Microsoft recommends anymore.
If you bind to a host name in IWS (i.e. port sharing), then the operating-system level HTTP.SYS component is used. That is much less flexible with WIA and every request must be authenticated. Which means it'll never work with Docker, npm, etc. So it's not recommended.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @michal-roszak_0767 ,
401/403 are not logged, so you won't see a server side event.
403 means authentication was successful but the permissions are not OK
My guess is that the wrong feed or credentials are being specified. Like maybe using an API key?
Thanks,
Alana
I'm not sure, but maybe it's something simple like a typo. I don't see it though.
That 401 message will occur when credentials weren't sent.
Behind the scenes, pgutil uses that API and authenticates by adding the same header:
https://github.com/Inedo/pgutil/blob/thousand/Inedo.ProGet/ProGetClient.cs#L37
Perhaps you can use a proxy like Fiddler or ProxyMan to see the difference in HTTP Traffic?
Thanks,
Alana
It sounds like you want to enable API v3, which uses the `v3/index.json' URL suffix?
In that case, make sure to set the useApiV3 property is set. Also, I don't think you can set all those properties on create... you may have to create, and then update.
Also note that you cannot set the endpointUrl property, it's just readonly. That is generated based on the incoming reques, so if you're viewing it on localhost you'll see that. If you view it on myserver.corp you'll see that, etc.
Hope that helps,
Alana
Hi @parthu-reddy ,
This looks more related to Server Overload / Database than anything to me. Note how all the requests are coming in at exact same second. Can you throttle your load balancer a bit, so they don't all hit at the same time? Even a slight delay will help.
FYI - we are tracking a recent regression to SQL Server analysis engine (???) that is causing one particular query (NuGet_GetPackage) to go incredibly slow under extreme traffic. For some reason, it's using the wrong plan suddly. It's been happening to a few users after a recent upgrade/patch to SQL Server. We have a work-around but would like to test it in the field against a user.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @marc-ledent_9164 ,
This is available in InedoCore-3.0.4, so if you go to Admin > Extensions, you should be bale to update.
thanks,
Alana
Hi @mhelp_5176 ,
I haven't investigated BitBucket Cloud any further, but it sounds like there's an issue with the integration -- and it's definitely something we can look at later. My guess is that it's some kind of change to the API/authentication. But we're all pretty focused on getting ProGet 2025 out the door, so it'll have to be after that.
That said, the main difference between connecting to a "Git host" like GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, BitBucket, etc. vs a "generic Git repository" is that there will be some intelligent drop downs to help you select a repository. There are a few other differences as well, but mostly it's UI.
So for example, on a GitHub connection, you'll see a list of organizations and repositories, and then would select the one to connect to. Compare this to the "Generic Git repository", where you simply paste in the repository clone url.
But in either case, you need to configure each repository connection individually; typically each application will have one repository, which is why this is part of the application creation process.
It's definitely not a common practice to be able to "pull in all the repositories in a workspace" at once - that's not really how Git works, and it would involve some kind of script that iterates a list of repositories and clones/updates each one indivdiaully based on configured remotes in subfolder.,
Cheers,
Alana
Hi Fritz,
Thanks for reporting this; the underlying with the Packages index file isn't so much the migration, but the code that generates the index file on the new feed.
Basically, the control files seem to be have an extra new line that isn't being trimmed. The old feed code must have removed them.
Anyways we will address this via PG-2985 in the next maintenance release or you can try the proget.inedo.com/productimages/inedo/proget:24.0.37-ci.2 container now.
Cheers,
Alana
Hi @michal-roszak_0767 ,
Looking over the code, the API Key Access Logs contain the api-key sent by the user, which is being displayed there. In retrospect, this isn't a great design...
It would be technically possible to link that to the "Edit API Key Page" itself, which would show you the description etc.... just a matter of whether that's worth us doing.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @mhelp_5176,
Based on the error, it sounds like there is some kind of configuration error / invalid response coming from the BitBucket Cloud API. It's possible the API/authentication policies changed -- we honestly don't really test against BitBucket Cloud, just BitBucket Server.
How about just using a Generic Git Repository? That uses a different API (the Git API) , so that might just work simpler/easier for you.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @marc-ledent_9164 ,
Yes, it's a somewhat common configuration; I would go to Admin > Security, and you can add a new directory/domain connection. Note you'll need information like a domain host, name/password, etc.
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @steviecoaster ,
Under Admin > Service, you should be able to see some logs being printed out. The DropPathMonitor will run periodically (or you can manually run it), and then you'll see some kind of log messages pertaining to what's happening.
It could be a lack of permissions, package already exists, etc.
Cheers,
Alana
The "File not found on disk" message means that the file was indexed in the database but it's not on disk. This can happen when files are directly deleted from the packagestore, removed by a quarantine tool, disk paths changed (common on Docker, if you mount wrong directory), etc.
Hopefully that makes sense and will help you troubleshoot from here. You can try to clear the cached files, run a feed-reindex, etc. But if all of your files are missing then that's probably not what you want to do.
Thanks,
Alana
@stefan-hakansson_8938 thanks for the heads up! We'll update this via PG-2982 in the next maintenance release to align with our docs page, which doesn't recommend apt-key
Hi @parthu-reddy ,
These are stored in the database and if you click "status" you can see the cached queries.
Does this metadata caching feature reduce the queries to fetch versions that you mentioned?
Yes, instead of going to NuGet.org, the database will be queried.
HOWEVER, this may actually reduce performance; NuGet.org is a static file system running on Azure Blob storage, and it might be quicker to download the query from Azure than to query your SQL Database.
You'd really need to expirement and see which is faster / more load.
Thanks,
Alana
@michal-roszak_0767 it wouldn't hurt to start a new topic about it, but it's design decision so you'd have to make a good use case for it :)
I can't find the discussion (maybe it was internal), but the idea is that "generic website connectors" for Asset Directories are a poor solution for "offline" environments. A "generic proxy" like ngnix will always be better in every way.
Hi @michal-roszak_0767 ,
Ah, that's what I thought you were asking in the first place :)
No, that's not a supported use case, I understand it's a design decision
Thanks,
Alana
Hi @michal-roszak_0767 ,
Thanks for clarifying; I thought you were looking to "proxy" a website like that...
ProGet has Asset Directories, which basically acts like a web-based file system.
Thanks,
Alana
By RAW repository, I think you mean like a website / web-based file system?
In any case, that's not something ProGet is designed to do -- I guess that'd be more like a "generic HTTP proxy server" type of tool?
Cheers,
Alana
Hi @michal-roszak_0767 ,
Just as an update, we've added this to our roadmap planning for ProGet 2026.
We will begin that process later this year, after ProGet 2025 has been released (see road to ProGet 2025).
Cheers,
Alana
Hi @carsten_1879 ,
Can you try using buildmaster:24.0.5 instead of latest? There was a change in the Git library, and I'm wondering if this is a kind of regression on some platforms.
Thanks ,
Alana