Support

• ?

  Delete Deployable
  buildmaster error deployables • 9 Nov 2012, 11:10 • Mani   9 Nov 2012, 11:35

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  8
  Views

  ? 9 Nov 2012, 11:35

  Yes we seem to have an older version. I will update this and let you know. Thanks Chris
• ?

  TFS repository triggers, exhausting available socket connections
  buildmaster error tfs • 5 Oct 2012, 09:41 • Mani   8 Nov 2012, 08:45

  7
  0
  Votes
  7
  Posts
  7
  Views

  ? 8 Nov 2012, 08:45

  That's great news John! (I had a 3 failed builds last night because of this issue)please let me know if you have any questions or if there is any additional information I can provide.
• ?

  Error connecting to issue tracker
  buildmaster error issue-tracking bugzilla • 25 Oct 2012, 22:24 • Mani   31 Oct 2012, 13:47

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  6
  Views

  ? 31 Oct 2012, 13:47

  Do you have access to the SQL Server that BuildMaster is using? Can you send the results of the following query to support-at-inedo-dot-com: SELECT * FROM Providers Most importantly, the Provider_Configuration column.
• ?

  Connection Strings
  buildmaster databases • 24 Oct 2012, 11:36 • Mani   25 Oct 2012, 11:28

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  24
  Views

  ? 25 Oct 2012, 11:28

  The Database Connections module is designed to segregate connection strings in this exact manner; this way, only certain privileged users can use the database connection their privileges allow. In this case, it might make sense to build a custom Database Provider that's based off of the SQL Server one. This is pretty easy, and several users have done this. Please contact support, and we will send the source code for this.
• P

  Are there (near-term) plans to support TFS2012 for source control in BuildMaster?
  buildmaster tfs source-control issue-tracking • 5 Jun 2012, 15:10 • pdickers_0718   22 Oct 2012, 14:19

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  8
  Views

  ? 22 Oct 2012, 14:19

  We just released our TFS2012 extension - http://inedo.com/buildmaster/extensions/tfs2012
• ?

  Filename Wildcards
  buildmaster variables • 17 Oct 2012, 12:17 • Mani   17 Oct 2012, 15:20

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  8
  Views

  ? 17 Oct 2012, 15:20

  This is not possible with that setup. If the DLLs are deployed separately at times, they should really be their own deployables (or even applications in some cases), that way you can specify them to be deployed at the release level. However, for your case, you may be able to get away with creating multiple variables (e.g. FILEMASK1, FILEMASK2, FILEMASKN, etc.) I'm not actually sure if that will work or not, and still wouldn't solve the problem if you have more than N files.
• ?

  Unable to create a build
  buildmaster error deployments • 15 Oct 2012, 05:37 • Mani   16 Oct 2012, 09:57

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  7
  Views

  ? 16 Oct 2012, 09:57

  Yes we do support other regions, we will file this as a bug targeted for the next release. Thank you for the report.
• ?

  Release/Build History
  buildmaster artifacts archive • 10 Oct 2012, 13:08 • Mani   10 Oct 2012, 13:47

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  10
  Views

  ? 10 Oct 2012, 13:47

  I will also add that there is a feature in the pipeline named "Release Archiving", which will allow deployed releases to be archived and delete the artifacts from a release for all but deployed builds. It will also delete the execution logs and messages for non-deployed builds. This feature (at the moment) is not scheduled for any particular release, but it should be coming in one of the next few minor (3.X) releases.
• ?

  ProGet search problem
  proget packages search • 12 Aug 2012, 06:15 • Mani   9 Oct 2012, 08:11

  7
  0
  Votes
  7
  Posts
  11
  Views

  ? 9 Oct 2012, 08:11

  Great - working well! Thanks
• ?

  Pull-based agent
  buildmaster agents • 5 Oct 2012, 13:52 • Mani   5 Oct 2012, 16:48

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  12
  Views

  ? 5 Oct 2012, 16:48

  At the moment, there is no way to accomplish the pull method. Our agents are extensible, but the BuildMaster service itself is not equipped to handle the incoming connections since it works backwards to the original design. We have however thought about implementing this type of agent specifically to allow for hosted instances of BuildMaster. If you are a looking to purchase the enterprise edition, there are additional support plans that we have done in the past that would expedite the delivery of features like this. If this interests you, please contact support@inedo.com.
• ?

  Error Running Database Change Scripts
  buildmaster databases • 3 Oct 2012, 11:50 • Mani   3 Oct 2012, 12:15

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  6
  Views

  ? 3 Oct 2012, 12:15

  Yes, deleting and readding the action step fixed this bug. I should have tried that, I suppose. Thanks! Matthew
• ?

  Quality Center
  buildmaster hpqc • 2 Oct 2012, 14:09 • Mani   2 Oct 2012, 14:44

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  1
  Views

  ? 2 Oct 2012, 14:44

  We currently have no first-class integration with HPQC but we're always looking for ways to integrate with third-party tools. We even offer extended support plans that can move the integration to the top of the list so to speak. If you'd be willing to email us at support@inedo.com with ideas on the sort of integration you're looking for, we'd be glad to take a look at that.
• ?

  Rename a CONFIG File
  buildmaster configuration-files • 1 Oct 2012, 11:40 • Mani   2 Oct 2012, 14:30

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  9
  Views

  ? 2 Oct 2012, 14:30

  Okay, thanks for letting me know. I did change the name through the database, and that worked just fine. The history of the rename is not as critical to me as the deployment history, so I think we're good for now. Thanks for the reply, Matthew
• ?

  Cannot view all AD Accounts in Users View
  buildmaster ldap user-interface • 1 Oct 2012, 11:27 • Mani   1 Oct 2012, 11:51

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  8
  Views

  ? 1 Oct 2012, 11:51

  The 1000 is a limit imposed by Active Directory presumably for performance reasons. Typically, you shouldn't ever need to be on the users page when using Integrated Security because once a user is assigned privileges via the "Assign Security Privileges" page, they automatically become a named user if there are licenses available when they visit the BuildMaster URL. We are planning an enhancement that will determine based on the assigned privileges whether the user should be approval-only or full, but for now it will default to full (if available) and downgrade to approval-only if no full user licenses are available. Once the user has become a named user, you can manually edit the type of user on the "License Key and Activation" page which allows you to select "[change]" to toggle the user between full or approval-only as needed.
• ?

  Add Environment Step to Workflow allows Edit to Config Files
  buildmaster configuration-files • 1 Oct 2012, 10:43 • Mani   1 Oct 2012, 11:06

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  4
  Views

  ? 1 Oct 2012, 11:06

  That solved it, thanks!
• ?

  Can't view application from outside localhost
  buildmaster integrated-web-server network • 26 Sept 2012, 16:58 • Mani   26 Sept 2012, 17:11

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  7
  Views

  ? 26 Sept 2012, 17:11

  Are you using the integrated web server? If so, you'll need to add the host name: http://inedo.com/support/kb/1014/changing-buildmasters-url-with-the-integrated-web-server It's also pretty easy to upgrade to IIS, if it's already installed on the box: http://inedo.com/support/kb/1013/hosting-buildmaster-through-iis-instead-of-the-integrated-web-server
• ?

  Redmine as issue tracker?
  buildmaster issue-tracking redmine • 19 Sept 2012, 18:51 • Mani   26 Sept 2012, 17:00

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  8
  Views

  ? 26 Sept 2012, 17:00

  Yes I could definitely help test an extension.
• ?

  Change an Application's Release Numbering Scheme
  buildmaster releases numbering • 22 Sept 2012, 19:22 • Mani   24 Sept 2012, 10:21

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  6
  Views

  ? 24 Sept 2012, 10:21

  Thanks for the update; we do plan on supporting this soon once a particular feature ("Release Archiving") is introduced. In the mean time, we can at least change some of the procs/funcs/etc that are crashing. If you can send us a backup of your database (support at inedo dot com), we could use that as a starting point and get a patch to you very soon. If you need to scrub sensitive data, this will do it: DELETE BuildExecution_PlanActionLogEntries UPDATE Providers SET Provider_Configuration = NULL UPDATE PlanActions SET Action_Configuration = NULL But it will also ruin your database, so obviously only do that on the database you'd send us :-)
• ?

  .NET : Unable to build 'X86' and 'Any CPU' projects together
  buildmaster net builds • 7 Sept 2012, 04:49 • Mani   20 Sept 2012, 13:52

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  61
  Views

  ? 20 Sept 2012, 13:52

  I think the problem may have to do with your project/solution configuration (i.e. .sln and .vbproj/.csproj files). In the action's execution log, you can see the exact command run by the Action. I would suggest to run that command at your desktop, and then try to see what specific project is missing the output path... and then tweak the project files.
• ?

  Any way to build a .NET solution just as how it builds in Visual Studio ?
  buildmaster net builds • 7 Sept 2012, 05:01 • Mani   7 Sept 2012, 11:29

  7
  0
  Votes
  7
  Posts
  177
  Views

  ? 7 Sept 2012, 11:29

  Yes,I would think the same. Thanks for clarifying. Please plan to release this fix at the earliest possible and would be glad if you can keep us informed on the same. For now, building .NET projects is really turning out to be a painful task just because of this one issue. Fortunately, there are some tedious workarounds.