Support

• ?

  .NET : Unable to build 'X86' and 'Any CPU' projects together
  buildmaster net builds • 7 Sept 2012, 04:49 • Michael   20 Sept 2012, 13:52

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  61
  Views

  ? 20 Sept 2012, 13:52

  I think the problem may have to do with your project/solution configuration (i.e. .sln and .vbproj/.csproj files). In the action's execution log, you can see the exact command run by the Action. I would suggest to run that command at your desktop, and then try to see what specific project is missing the output path... and then tweak the project files.
• ?

  Any way to build a .NET solution just as how it builds in Visual Studio ?
  buildmaster net builds • 7 Sept 2012, 05:01 • Michael   7 Sept 2012, 11:29

  7
  0
  Votes
  7
  Posts
  177
  Views

  ? 7 Sept 2012, 11:29

  Yes,I would think the same. Thanks for clarifying. Please plan to release this fix at the earliest possible and would be glad if you can keep us informed on the same. For now, building .NET projects is really turning out to be a painful task just because of this one issue. Fortunately, there are some tedious workarounds.
• ?

  Unhandled Error Page on Clicking - Manage Release\Create New Release
  buildmaster error iis • 5 Sept 2012, 07:39 • Michael   5 Sept 2012, 13:43

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  8
  Views

  ? 5 Sept 2012, 13:43

  The second issues I posted, has got fixed when I changed the regional settings to UK and now I am able to set a date in the datepicker control! Please fix this issue in next release guys. The first issue might well be because of the web site settings. Weird thing is the BuildMaster website was in 2.0 but the root websites setting was in 4.0. I ran aspnet_regiis -sn WSVC/ on all the paths and changed everything to 2.0. Did a IISreset but still didnt work ! But after doing that,I uninstalled and reinstalled the BM and it is working now ! Thanks for the help but please investigate the issue and would help if you can publish the corrrect IIS settings in deployment guide.
• ?

  How do I create Config files using ClickOnce process
  buildmaster clickonce • 29 Aug 2012, 13:21 • Michael   29 Aug 2012, 14:12

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  3
  Views

  ? 29 Aug 2012, 14:12

  Configuration files must be associated with a deployable, which means you need at least 1 deployable in your application. Some of the differences between a deployable and an application are highlighted in this article: http://inedo.com/support/kb/1032/the-difference-between-deployables-and-applications For now, just create a deployable with the same name as your application and then you'll be able to create a config file.
• ?

  Proget - Security Question
  proget security • 25 Aug 2012, 16:22 • Michael   27 Aug 2012, 09:52

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  8
  Views

  ? 27 Aug 2012, 09:52

  Passing in a username/password is controlled through the API key argument when there is no API key assigned for the feed in ProGet: http://inedo.com/support/documentation/proget/feeds/api-keys
• ?

  Choose which target server and database to deploy a release
  buildmaster databases deployments • 19 Aug 2012, 22:30 • Michael   20 Aug 2012, 11:20

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  12
  Views

  ? 20 Aug 2012, 11:20

  When you share/link action groups, you may select a "Default Server" for the actions, which means you can link them across environments and still have the actions run on different servers (just select the local BuildMaster server for the actions, that will be overridden by the selected default server of the group). If you choose a separate build server for your actions instead, that will take precendence over the default server unless the build server is the same as the BuildMaster server; if that's the case you can just put those actions in a separate group. As for the database selection, we could update that action to allow selection via a variable or have a default option that chooses the DB based on the environment it's in.
• ?

  Creating a custom Database extension
  buildmaster databases • 15 Aug 2012, 21:03 • Michael   16 Aug 2012, 10:05

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  7
  Views

  ? 16 Aug 2012, 10:05

  Thanks Steve. That was enough for us to implement a custom action, and the action were pretty easy to implement based on the source code that you provided. Appreciate the prompt response!
• ?

  Backup PROD database to DEV or TEST
  buildmaster databases • 14 Aug 2012, 09:58 • Michael   14 Aug 2012, 10:13

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  5
  Views

  ? 14 Aug 2012, 10:13

  Thanks for the confirmation. I just tested this technique, and it worked really well, actually. I'm going to use the following naming convention: DEV SQL Server (the actual DEV database) TEST to DEV SQL Server (the TEST database available to the DEV BuildMaster environment) PROD to DEV SQL Server (the PROD database available to the DEV BuildMaster environment) I was concerned that BuildMaster would want to re-initialize the database, but it didn't. In fact, during the next build in DEV, BuildMaster correctly backed up my PROD db and restored to DEV and then determined that my SQL Change Script had never been run (since the BuildMaster execution table is also restored). This is how I expect and want it to behave. Thanks again for the VERY FAST response! Matthew
• ?

  Feature Request: Comments Field for Config File Deployment
  buildmaster configuration-files • 7 Aug 2012, 10:30 • Michael   7 Aug 2012, 10:47

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  11
  Views

  ? 7 Aug 2012, 10:47

  Yes, I would like a comments field for when I deploy a config file. I already liberally use the comments field when editing. Thanks!
• ?

  ClickOnce installation/signing problem
  buildmaster net clickonce • 5 Aug 2012, 10:57 • Michael   6 Aug 2012, 14:35

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  38
  Views

  ? 6 Aug 2012, 14:35

  FYI we have released a new version of the DotNetRecipes extension, if you update that extension within BuildMaster then re-create the example app, the signing should work correctly. As for the certificate hash problem, that has been resolved in the .NET extension which is scheduled for a release later today or early tomorrow.
• ?

  Cache packages doesn't seem to work
  proget packages • 30 Jul 2012, 13:03 • Michael   31 Jul 2012, 06:59

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  9
  Views

  ? 31 Jul 2012, 06:59

  Fantastic! Thanks for the speedy response. Works fine now.
• ?

  ProGet - feed search returns wrong results
  proget packages search • 24 Jul 2012, 06:57 • Michael   31 Jul 2012, 01:14

  8
  0
  Votes
  8
  Posts
  10
  Views

  ? 31 Jul 2012, 01:14

  Thank you! I will try it now.
• ?

  Triggering multiple
  buildmaster builds promotions • 27 Jul 2012, 07:53 • Michael   30 Jul 2012, 21:16

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  6
  Views

  ? 30 Jul 2012, 21:16

  Thanks look forward to it
• ?

  Simultaneous Builds for Application
  buildmaster builds workflows • 24 Jul 2012, 06:55 • Michael   27 Jul 2012, 10:30

  8
  0
  Votes
  8
  Posts
  22
  Views

  ? 27 Jul 2012, 10:30

  My fault, I had forgotten about the shared TMP directory and was focused on the WRK and SRC ones. It appears then that building the same app but different workflows at the same time is not currently supported, but there are workarounds. As an example, you could use a different environment (e.g. Integration2) for the patch workflow, then link/share all the action groups from Integration. If you were to then install a BuildMaster agent on the BuildMaster server (and add it via the Servers page), that agent would have its own set of temporary directories. All you'd have to do is update the "default server" setting for each action group in Integration2 to point to the agent server.
• ?

  [ProGet] Pushing a package to a feed using the command line
  proget packages publishing • 28 Jun 2012, 12:38 • Michael   25 Jul 2012, 13:19

  18
  0
  Votes
  18
  Posts
  282
  Views

  ? 25 Jul 2012, 13:19

  Installed 1.0.7, and no issues to report with our network share backed feed. Thx.
• ?

  Deploying Multiple Artifacts in one Action Group
  buildmaster artifacts deployables • 25 Jul 2012, 08:07 • Michael   25 Jul 2012, 10:44

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  9
  Views

  ? 25 Jul 2012, 10:44

  Ah. Currently on 2.6. Will upgrade immediately!
• ?

  How do I get a free license for usage in disconnected environment?
  buildmaster licensing • 9 Jul 2012, 09:40 • Michael   24 Jul 2012, 03:16

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  50
  Views

  ? 24 Jul 2012, 03:16

  Thank you. The server was activated fine and is working very well. I am satisfied.
• ?

  Builds failing with imported deployable
  buildmaster error builds imported-deployables • 19 Jul 2012, 13:14 • Michael   23 Jul 2012, 15:31

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  15
  Views

  ? 23 Jul 2012, 15:31

  For future reference, this was happening because the application attempting to be built was including an imported deployable, and there was no active build in the referenced application. The error message will be clarified in the next version of BuildMaster (v3.2.2).
• ?

  Can I see who deleted an automatic schedule?
  buildmaster triggered-builds audit • 23 Jul 2012, 15:01 • Michael   23 Jul 2012, 15:03

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  6
  Views

  ? 23 Jul 2012, 15:03

  Yes, but not easily. Automatic build records (schedule, SCM-triggered, or URL-triggered) are not "soft deleted", so you must go to the audit logs and search for the "BSHDEL" event. This can be done from the UI or directly from the database with SELECT * FROM EventOccurences WHERE Event_Code='BSHDEL'
• ?

  How to configure github with buildmaster?
  buildmaster source-control git github • 9 Jul 2012, 03:12 • Michael   9 Jul 2012, 10:44

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  13
  Views

  ? 9 Jul 2012, 10:44

  Do you know if you are running the BuildMaster web application through the integrated web server, or if it's hosted by IIS? For the integrated web server, ensure that its service runs under Administrator as well. If you're using IIS, you'll have to verify that the app pool's identity is running as the Administrator account in addition to the BuildMaster service. Right now we are in the process of writing a knowledge base article that will give step-by-step instructions with regards to connecting to GitHub since that seems to be the most common hosted solution for our Git integration.