Thanks ! Works as expected... as always :)

@jblaine_9526 Thanks for clarifying! I think SAML integration is one of those "write-once" things, where we completely forget about how it works every time I'm not so familiar with SAML behind the scenes... do you know how "SAML group claims" work? For example... Is it something that comes back in the XML response, or does it require a separate request? What do the "group claims" look like? Like a list of human-readable group names? And them most importantly... what should ProGet do with such claims upon receipt? Treat the user as if they're in the group (kind of like LDAP groups), and allow permissions to be assigned against that group (like LDAp, but without searching)?

Hi, Thanks for the bug report! We've logged and fixed these as PG-2098 and PG-2099. Note that due to limitations in how that dependency table is built, it's nontrivial to have it take you to the latest package that satisfies the given range if it has an exclusive upper bound - but we have changed it to prefer linking to the upper version number if one is present. -Greg

Good news! Thanks!