Welcome to the Inedo Forums! Check out the Forums Guide for help getting started.
If you are experiencing any issues with the forum software, please visit the Contact Form on our website and let us know!
Rust - invalid gzip header
-
Previously, I reported a bug where publishing Rust packages wouldn't compress properly and thus wouldn't be able to be viewed online or pulled. Re: Rust Crates are uploaded with an incorrect compression method
I am experiencing a new error when attempting to pull a Rust package from ProGet.
Error:
Caused by: failed to iterate over archive Caused by: invalid gzip header
I am able to view the package fine on the web interface, which is unique to the previous error.
-
Hi @rel_0477 ,
Sounds like this is a pretty specific edge case. Can you provide a reproduction case so we can take a look?
Thanks,
Alana
-
I reproduced it in the following:
cargo new reproduction --lib cd reproduction cargo publish --index sparse+<proget url> --token <token> --allow-dirty cd .. cargo new pull cd pull nano Config.toml
My Config.toml:
[package] name = "pull" version = "0.1.0" edition = "2024" publish = ["crates-io"] [dependencies] reproduction = {version = "0.1.0", registry = "crate"}
cargo build
Result:
cargo build Updating `crate` index Locking 1 package to latest Rust 1.87.0 compatible version Downloaded reproduction v0.1.0 (registry `crate`) error: failed to unpack package `reproduction v0.1.0 (registry `crate`)` Caused by: failed to iterate over archive Caused by: invalid gzip header
-
Hi @rel_0477,
Thanks for sending over the reproduction case. I was able to identify the issue, PG-2993, and have it ready to go in the next maintenance release of ProGet.
Thanks,
Rich
-
@rhessinger Thank you for the quick response! I am still experiencing this issue on the latest release of ProGet, are you able to verify that it is fixed on your end? Thank you again.
-
Hi @rel_0477,
I apologize for not responding sooner. Can you please navigate to Manage Feed -> Storage & Retention and run the re-index operation? That should fix any packages that were pushed with the invalid JSON header.
Thanks,
Rich
-
@rhessinger Are you kidding? You responded extremely fast! I wasn't being sarcastic, I truly appreciate the rapid support from the ProGet team, it's admirable.
I went ahead and ran the index job and deleted the package and republished it to no avail. I also went ahead and retried the reproduction case above, and it worked fine (I was able to publish & pull).
Cargo logs:
$ cargo build Updating `crate` index Locking 1 package to latest Rust 1.87.0 compatible version Downloaded reprod v0.1.0 (registry `crate`) Downloaded 1 crate (815B) in 0.17s Compiling reprod v0.1.0 (registry `crate`) Compiling pull v0.1.0 (C:\Users\relax\dev\rust\.test\pull) Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 2.03s $ cargo build Updating `crate` index Locking 3 packages to latest Rust 1.87.0 compatible versions Adding bridge-logger v1.0.0 (registry `crate`) Adding log v0.4.27 (registry `crate`) Adding once_cell v1.21.3 (registry `crate`) error: failed to download `bridge-logger v1.0.0 (registry `crate`)` Caused by: unable to get packages from source Caused by: failed to unpack package `bridge-logger v1.0.0 (registry `crate`)` Caused by: failed to iterate over archive Caused by: invalid gzip header
Results from the reindex:
INFO : 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - Performing reindex for Cargo feed 2: cargo INFO : 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - Deactivating feed. DEBUG: 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - Checking for crates that include a JSON header... DEBUG: 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - Found 0 crates with JSON headers. DEBUG: 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - Checking for orphaned FeedPackages... DEBUG: 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - No orphaned FeedPackages found. DEBUG: 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - Recalculating latest versions of packages... DEBUG: 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - Health check complete; recording results... INFO : 2025-06-19 18:11:40Z - Re-activating feed.
I'm not sure what would be causing my original package to not even be able to be pulled, I suspect it might be cached improperly. I'll continue to investigate to ensure that it's my side only.
Thank you again, I truly appreciate all of the support.
-
@rel_0477 Yes, it was my side. Thank you!
-
Hi @rel_0477,
I just happen to check right when this came in. Glad to hear it is working again! Was it the local cache? Cargo has a pretty aggressive cache for both good and bad packages.
Thanks,
Rich