@dean-houston, thanks for fixing that bug and detailed response to dependencies.
Welcome to the Inedo Forums! Check out the Forums Guide for help getting started.
If you are experiencing any issues with the forum software, please visit the Contact Form on our website and let us know!
Posts
-
RE: Remote packages that isnt cached does not format correctly
-
Remote packages that isnt cached does not format correctly
Hello ProGet users and devs!
We have a server running on Linux server using podman and nginx reverse proxy. We have two feeds where one has a connector to the other. We want one feed with approved packages, and a team specific feed where they promote a subset for their own development (strict license requirements etc).
We have this configured using the internal hostname for the ProGet container (connector traffic does not leave the container).But I'm starting this topic to ask if its expected behavior that formatting of uncached remote packages is a litte off? See screenshots.
And if anyone have experience with promoting packages including their dependencies I am open to suggestions. (Right now I'm thinking a script that first pull the packages, and the loop to pull/promote the depedencies)
Examples where "approved-pypi" is all approved packages, and "promoted-pypi" is our team specific feed with a subset of packages.
We have taken inspiration from the "Effective-Package-Management-in-Python" e-book.


Looking forward to your replies,
Gisle S.