<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[GitHub Packages]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">We are using GitHub packages to provide private internal feeds for Nuget and NPM.  As we move to using ProGet, is it recommended to create a connection to those and proxy them like the public feeds, or should we be looking to move to hosted feeds inside ProGet?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.inedo.com/topic/5816/github-packages</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:20:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forums.inedo.com/topic/5816.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 19:37:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to GitHub Packages on Wed, 12 Aug 2026 01:49:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bobmaurer" aria-label="Profile: bobmaurer">@<bdi>bobmaurer</bdi></a> ,</p>
<p dir="auto">We recommend to import those packages into ProGet and publish to ProGet going forward.</p>
<p dir="auto">That keeps ProGet as the source of truth for your artifacts, reduces a lot of network traffic, makes it easier for developers to not worry about multiple sources, and eliminates a lot of possible headaches later with configuration/outages/authentication./etc. Much simpler this way.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best,<br />
Alana</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.inedo.com/post/19953</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.inedo.com/post/19953</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[atripp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 01:49:28 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>